View Single Post
Posts: 367 | Thanked: 176 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#17
Originally Posted by ABerri View Post
I ordered an N900 and to my knowledge the HD2 is not a "lesser" phone. I think the N900 and the HTC HD2 are probably the two top smartphones to own today or whenever they are released.

Maybe the HD2 is better than the N900 in ways such as Portrait mode since it can do almost everything in that mode whereas the N900 is still landscape. Yes we are hoping that some of the "fixes" Nokia is supposedly doing is creating more Portrait orientation on the phone so we are able to use it with one hand sometimes.

And I understand the thread creator's frustration. Why Peter and his team are being soo shallow with their communication when they know they have a bunch of upset people who pre-ordered this phone and when there is a delay, show appreciation to your consumers and give us hopeful info and accurate deadlines.
Actually, the N900 and the HD2 has similar hardware when it comes to the processing power, but you're forgetting the details, which are important as well. Has HTC ever used a decent camera in their phones, no matter the resolution? Stereo speakers? Good quality materials?

No offence, but HTC just orders the hardware parts and the OS, and then they take some glue and "make the phone", and later they sell it, without the details...

Edit: I forgot to mention the nice profits HTC likes to make... you can't argue about that HTC will never enter the mainstream market, simply because their business model where they charge about €100 extra doesn't work in this segment. For example, a HTC TP2 (with significantly worse hardware) costs more than an N900...

Last edited by c0rt3x; 2009-10-27 at 22:53.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to c0rt3x For This Useful Post: