View Single Post
Posts: 203 | Thanked: 68 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#35
Originally Posted by fnordianslip View Post
My point is primarily about poor use of language, and not so much about interpretation of the law, about which quite frankly, I couldn't care less.
Anyway, 'nuff said I guess on this matter. Hopefully someone will drag it back on topic.
Yes, to me you were the one playing fast and loose with the multiple possible meanings of the word "may," using a semantic argument to make a point that just didn't stand up in the context. And my use of language in my mechanic analogy is not poor, simply because you're unable to understand it.