Oh, and I just read the Ubuntu review. I think it was really pathetic. Are you SURE that someone running Windows FOR THE FIRST TIME who was used to Ubuntu wouldn't say the same stuff? I have seen MANY Linux users making the same idiotic types of comments about Windows. They are stupid when Windows users make them and they are stupid when Linux users make them.
(I often forget what environment I'm in, personally; I see right now that I thought I was in Linux but I'm in Windows 7! Once you get into a browser it's hard to tell, especially when you're sleepy and it is 3:40 a.m.
Linux took 40 seconds to boot. Yes, that’s faster than the 55 seconds Windows 7 took to boot (and on a faster laptop, too), but, still, 40 seconds is pathetic.
The background was “offensively brown” – something people have been telling Canonical for years.
The writer “struggled to see other machines and devices on my network.”
Audacity was “more complex to get hold of”
He gave up trying to use Spotify, because it required Wine.
It wasn’t immediately apparent that clicking on the Ubuntu logo took him back to the desktop.
A Canonical advisor had to come over and install a few extra things for him, including Flash, but still he “struggled to work out how I would organise photos, music and video.”
Ubuntu “would not make my computing life any simpler and more pleasurable than it is now.”