View Single Post
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#75
Originally Posted by nhanquy View Post
Of course I don't have all the facts. But my common sense would say that Nokia has tried to avoid its responsibility to support the N810 by using Mer as a community support OS and not by Nokia.
Unfortunately, again, this common sense doesn't have much to do with reality.

Originally Posted by nhanquy View Post
Of course hardware configurations are different between the N900 and N800; but they were also between the N810 and N800. It was made by a marketing/profitable decision rather than technical one, I think.
The N800 and N810 are basically the same piece of hardware at their core. For all practical purposes, there are no differences between them. Supporting the N800 basically came free when you supported the N810.

The differences between the N8x0 line and the N900, however, are more extreme than even those between the N800 and the 770.

Originally Posted by nhanquy View Post
My other 2c!
Again, still not worth much. Facts are available in abundance here, so gut feelings aren't particularly useful.
__________________
Ryan Abel
 

The Following User Says Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: