View Single Post
Posts: 203 | Thanked: 68 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#165
Originally Posted by Laughing Man View Post
I don't think Apple has a patent on multi-touch specifically. If so the USPTO REALLY REALLY screwed up. But rather they obtained a patent based on certain gestures (e.g. pinching). Which is still a screw-up. So even if Google had multi-touch support built in, Apple couldn't do anything as long as Google doesn't do pinch zooming.

But it's more likely that Apple realizes their patent is worthless if any court case were to look into it so they're hoping nobody else realizes that. :P

I really do wonder what's going on.
I think if we realize it, Google and their lawyers definitely realize it.

Anyway, I don't think I said anywhere above that Apple somehow has a patent on multi-touch in general. I referred to Apple's patents (plural), they have patents on different gestures and techniques. I was already saying, what you're saying.

Also, in my post that you were quoting and responding to, I specifically pointed out that Apple actually doesn't have a patent on pinch-and-zoom (and cited a source to this end). So I'm not sure why you're referring to Apple as having a patent on pinching, as a reponse to my post talking about how they don't. That's part of the oddness of this whole thing. Most of the noise from Apple is about pinch-and-zoom, but that's actually one of the things that they don't even seem to have a bogus patent on.

In the end it seems like Apple has a lot of patents on things having to do with multi-touch (which are probably bogus), but nobody is necessarily copying those particular things. Still Apple is trying to intimidate people into thinking they somehow just own multi-touch in general. Except it doesn't seem like any handset manufacturer is actually intimidated.