View Single Post
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#8
Originally Posted by marcinw View Post
generally we know about more and more disadvantages of this product.
A good thing to know both the advantages as well as the disadvantages of a product you're going to buy. It will have disadvantages like any product has. Those who believe the product they're going to buy is flawless and perfect are living in a pink cloud akin to falling in love.

And other companies are creating/announcing new and new models in this time.
Yeah, and none of them is a viable alternative for me.

why should we believe that everything will be OK ?
Why not? Everything Will Be Okay In The End. If It's Not Okay, It's Not The End.

That maemo will be continued ?
you think Harmattan which is Maemo 6.0 won't happen? You think the 5 step plan is bullocks? If Maemo would discontinue the whole department would close. People would be fired. Some would be transfered. Do you see that happening? Read on...

Nokia showed many times, that isn't interested in helping Open Source developers (yes, many times we tried to get some help in creating Gnokii/Gammu and nothing, since Series 40 3.0 there is even problem with SMS in filesystem).
Yes, but Nokia also shows they are interested. They have contributed source code, including some closed source such as drivers. They bought TrollTech for example, and are investing in Qt for both Maemo and Symbian. They sponsor Maemo related events. They're developing a product for profit. Its a big sum of + and -. If N900 would turn out to be a complete fail, maybe Maemo would come to an end. But as it is, it seems to create quite some attraction, and not only from open source or Linux enthusiasts. Entirely the point of step 4/5!

No real SyncML engine (at least I don't know about any).
My E71 uses SyncML?

And why is so long delayed ?
Approx one month. According to current data the product is delayed for a minimum of 9 days (assuming 31 October and 9 November) and a maximum of 61 days (assuming 1 October and 31 November). It has to be noted both are extremes (hence 'min' and 'max').

Problems in creating hardware
Hardware or software, we don't know. Officially due to 'feedback from 300+ developers'.

What about other things - for example, will be N900 protected with simlocks ?
Why not? Who cares? Buy unbranded without simlock, or get the thing off when you're legally to do so.

I see one possibility: N900 is created by small group of enthusiasts and they don't have too big budget and too big help from other departments.
Actually, they're hiring, and I'm pretty sure you can see an increase of employees in Maemo dept.

Please correct me, if I'm wrong...but even, when device will be in shops, it will need a lot of work.
Ofcourse it needs some cornering of rough edges. In practice, any new device does. What defines a lot of work is up for debate. However, one of the reasons the product is delayed is to lower the initial complaints, the initial reception.

And of course 3rd party people (like me) will have to do it for free....
There are methods to get paid too, and if you don't like to work for free don't do it. However, many here contribute while not getting paid.

Of course, nobody will force me to buy/not buy this device. Maybe it will be better to forget about it ?
Clearly, you're much more negative about the product then me. I find your post one-sided not taking into account several important factors, partly unrealistic, and overly negative not taking into account positive factors. As topic starter you could have made a more balanced first post for starting a discussion, but you hardly mentioned any positive aspects, while most of what I wrote is pretty widely available information and known among the community. Although your post is also slightly informative such pertains to past and other Nokia departments, and does not take recent work of Maemo development team into account.

My question: excluding brand, what could convince me to connect my future with this system ?
Because all the other options are worse. This platform has the most potency. A Linux kernel with embedded userland, POSIX compliant stack, X11, and GTK/Qt, and tons of other userspace compatible with either open standards, FRAND standards, or Linux standards.

And I'm not gonna say why competitors are worse. Because then it will become a compare thread. Which is OK to do, but we have tons of those. We also have tons of threads where people outline why N900 is best for them. You can read those and decide. Or make yet another. In the end, YMMV, you pick what is best for you.
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
 

The Following 22 Users Say Thank You to allnameswereout For This Useful Post: