View Single Post
Posts: 1,255 | Thanked: 393 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ US
#14
Originally Posted by Crashdamage View Post
Veri$on is kinda fulla sh$$. Good coverage, but $$. I would never get CDMA service anyway.

Also consider that since it's CDMA service:

1. No 3G data usage while on the phone, same as 2G (Edge) with GSM service. IOW, if you have GSM 3G and you're checking emails or doing a file download when you get a call, you answer the call and the 3G data keeps flowing. Not so with CDMA 3G, the data stops 'til you hang up. And many users seem to have problems resuming where they left off.

2. No SIM cards.

3. CDMA is a dead-end technology. Veri$on may be greedy and controlling, but not stupid. They'll lead the way to the changeover to next-gen LTE service, 'cause they know they've gotta dump CDMA soon to stay competitive.

4. T-Mo's 3G network is building out a a furious pace, and will have the most modern equipment - and so is the fastest.
I completely agree, but from a practical perspective, weak spots with Tmo and my G1 or Dash that have one GSM bar or no service all get one to two 3G bars on Verizon and Droid.

I was able to watch HQ video from Jetflicks and Youtube in the same spots I have no service with Tmo. That is just so wrong.

If N900 was Verizon, I would leave Tmo. With 15% corp discount it would still be $14 more a month, but the 3G truly everywhere I went was pretty cool. In KY of all places. Who'd a thunk' it?

added:

I wish I never tested Verizon, since ignorance is bliss.

In regards to blocking Flash, doesn't that defeat a key advantage of the N900 and its browser? Already plenty of choices that load pages fast without Flash. Adblock one would be handy though.

Last edited by Rushmore; 2009-11-14 at 15:09.