View Single Post
Posts: 670 | Thanked: 747 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Kansas City, Missouri, USA
#11
Originally Posted by The_Solutor View Post
Palm is a very well recognized brand in the US, and has a very good experience on the UI and ergonomic of the mobile devices.
Palm is pretty much a has-been in the US. The name can't be worth $2 billion. If it's patents Palm owns, what are they and why isn't Palm making big bucks from them now?

As far as any UI goodies (or anything else) in WebOS, what does it do significantly better than Maemo? The 'flip-away cards' thingie? Ya gotta be kiddin' me...so what?

And if Nokia buys Palm, doesn't Palm + Nokia + WebOS + Symbian + Maemo sound like a great recipe for customer and marketing confusion and complexity?

Seems to me Nokia could do a lot more to get into the mid-to-high-end US smartphone market by investing a billion or two into Maemo development and a marketing blitz than buying a sickly Palm.

...buying Palm could make perfect sense for Nokia, as buying Chrysler did for Fiat.
Buying Chrysler didn't work our well at all for Daimler-Benz. Smart as they are, they still lost almost 100% of the billions they invested. It won't work for Fiat either.
__________________
Registered Linux user #266531.

Last edited by Crashdamage; 2009-11-14 at 16:20.