View Single Post
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#19
Originally Posted by Crashdamage View Post
Palm is pretty much a has-been in the US. The name can't be worth $2 billion. If it's patents Palm owns, what are they and why isn't Palm making big bucks from them now?

As far as any UI goodies (or anything else) in WebOS, what does it do significantly better than Maemo? The 'flip-away cards' thingie? Ya gotta be kiddin' me...so what?

And if Nokia buys Palm, doesn't Palm + Nokia + WebOS + Symbian + Maemo sound like a great recipe for customer and marketing confusion and complexity?
.
1) Patents =/= instant money. You can have patents on great ideas but suck at implementing them or convincing why people need it.

Maybe WebOS + QT might be a way for inter-operatibility of applications from Symbian to Maemo platforms. It would also lessen the problem of loss of support when Maemo 5 goes to Maemo 6.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...