But if the Linux kernel is completely open, how can Google lock out the root? Isn't that against the open-source nature of Linux?
I can see Nokia's incentive for creating Maemo for its own devices, but what incentive does Google have for creating Android, since they technically don't build their own phones? If they are charging OEMs for Android, isn't that also against the free and open source nature of Linux?
If Android does lack the root feature, how are people able to write apps for it? Since Maemo is more open than Android, I'm pretty surprised that Android seems to be taking off more so than Maemo is. Aside from Android being backed by Google, are there any other reasons why it is more prevalent in new devices (ie. why aren't others adopting Maemo)? Thanks again for the great info guys!
They're maemo and MeeGo... "Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...