View Single Post
Posts: 118 | Thanked: 26 times | Joined on Jun 2008
#134
Originally Posted by andrewfblack View Post
I might piss some people off but I'm a GNU kind of guy I don't feel sorry that someone who wants to charge for an application has to spend money to make it. Don't get me wrong I will buy some applications and have no problem paying for good ones
That's pretty much how I see it. I have no problem with proprietary software (when it works!), although I prefer free software.

Potential sellers on the Ovi store will have to decide whether the cost involved in getting the required insurance is enough to make it less likely that they will make money at it. If not, so be it.

I understand Nokia's position. Requiring insurance is the only way to make the indemnification clause effective. The indemnification clause between you and Nokia has absolutely no effect on the right of a third party to sue Nokia. You can't contract away someone else's rights.

Smaller companies certainly don't have the financial resources to defend Nokia against an IP lawsuit, thus the insurance. Larger companies will already have general liability insurance.