View Single Post
Posts: 337 | Thanked: 160 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ München, DE
#137
Originally Posted by sharper View Post
The "reasons" for paying for OSS software are numerous and the point is not that people will always publish the source code for their N900 applications - the point is that source code availability is irrelevant to this discussion.
Well, then we clearly have a different understanding of what Open Source should be. Let's call it free software instead. And that is where source code availablity isn't irrelevant.

As said, I do understand if people want to sell apps, but I'd rather see people going the free software route.

People do pay for OSS applications and the limited ability to make software for the N900 and get paid for it by people who want to pay for it will hurt the platform. People will just go to other competing platforms and those applications and users will be there instead of here.
Again: I have no problem with that, but as said before: In case of free software the first buyer can put the software up somewhere else. So maybe we should stop talking about free software in the ovi store, as Maemo already has distribution channels for that.

Nokia needs to figure out what the heck it's doing. As I wrote in another thread Nokia has all the appearances of an organisation in civil war. Different people are obviously trying to push it in different directions and what we end up is a compromise that satisfies nobody.
I never said anything which doesn't agree to that.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to range For This Useful Post: