I want the best hardware, I want flexiblity and I want the best user experience. I like gadgets, but I'm not a programmer.

I read sr1329's tale and I believe sr1328 does him/herself a disservice by using very semantically loaded words, and right off the bat more or less dismissing the N900.

That said, my first thought when reading sr1329, was "Nokia, pick this up, learn from it, adapt." If there are criticisms and comments that could be applied to offer a better device, or a better interface, well use it. I believe this goes for every critical review. Why argue with it? Just look upon it as a potential to improve. Whatever sr1329's agenda, pick up the suggestions, address them, progress and develop.

If Nokia wants to dominate the pocketable computer segment, enabling consumers to use the devices in a streamlined way, they will have to adapt or else competition will kill the company. I guess that's why they're going to launch Maemo 6, with capacitive display etc. I don't care for capacitive display, but the great majority out there seem to. So Nokia has to adapt.

Otherwise they run the risk of being marginalized into the segment of high tech users, a segment that will be way too small for Nokia to survive.