View Single Post
Posts: 631 | Thanked: 1,123 times | Joined on Sep 2005 @ Helsinki
#81
Originally Posted by cb474 View Post
They were basically disappointed with the camera. They noted right away that the camera application is "basic" and missing features. And they found the actual image quality to be "about average" for 5MP phone cameras, with "pretty high" image noise.
--
But to me this further confirms my feeling that the N900 camera function was rushed out the door and/or not a priority. If I accept MountainX's argument that it's better to keep it simple and add features later, then Nokia ought to at least have focused on having the images and video created be high quality. But they even fall short here, compared to other devices currently on the market from Nokia themselves.
Well, the simplest way is just to just look at the N900 photo stream in Flickr:

http://www.flickr.com/groups/1184299@N24/pool/

81 members, so it's a really wide selection of photos from people taken with the N900, under different times and locations.