View Single Post
Posts: 203 | Thanked: 68 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#92
Originally Posted by qole View Post
It's not so much about agreement, but about the amount of content in various posts.
Yes and my point was that the people disagreeing with me have posted just as much content in their posts, but you have no snarky words for them. So I think you're disengenuous complaining about my posts and not others. As I said, it seems like you just don't agree with me, so you reserve your snarky comments for me.

Originally Posted by qole
There's some really interesting stuff being written in this thread. I was suggesting, in my obnoxious, snarky way, that I prefer technical discussions and comparisons over opinions, speculation and impressions.
Yeah, and I've been posting links to reviews of the camera and summarizing what they're saying, as well as citing links to the specifications for the N900, to back up my point of view about the current state of the camera and camera application on the N900. And other people have just been speculating about what might come to pass with updates and third party applications in the future. Or providing completely general posts about nature of development in the Linux world or how complicated it is to make a device like the N900 or the nature of first version firmware (things that could be said about almost any device). So again, your post seems disengenuous. I've been providing actual information and specifications about the N900 itself, but you see the other completely speculative posts about the future and general comments about Linux as somehow more substantive and on topic. Honestly I think I've been sticking far closer to the topic of the N900 camera application, it's actual state as it actually is, and how it compares to other Nokia N series devices (which is after all the topic of this thread, which I started).