Thread: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls
View Single Post
vitaly_repin's Avatar
vitaly_repin is offline vitaly_repin
2009-11-30 , 11:07
Posts: 320 | Thanked: 763 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Espoo, FInland
#158
Originally Posted by fouro View Post
And for me, as an end user (and customer), the lack of that feature will mean I can't even use it, wanted or not. And apparently I'm not the only one.
Yes. This is absolutely clear. As well as I am also not the only user (yes, I am speaking as as user now!) who does not want to use the device which can be wiped by system administrator. So, there are 2 groups of users with contradiction requirements.

In fact I even can suggest the proper solution for this. To support provisioning feature and to let the end-user to turn it off (make the device non-provisionable). If the user works for a company which prohibits the usage of non-provisionable devices, he/she will be unhappy but he/she shall blame the employer in this case, not device manufacturer.

Does it sound reasonable for you?

I would think that as employee for Nokia you could still deliver the feedback for people who make the decisions since you're taking part in the conversation?
Sure.

But thanks for the reply. I'll have to find a way to give feedback directly to Nokia through some other route.
Thank you.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to vitaly_repin For This Useful Post: