Thread: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls
View Single Post
fouro is offline fouro
2009-12-01 , 08:24
Posts: 36 | Thanked: 22 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Helsinki
#173
Originally Posted by "vitaly_repin
I am not sure that having 2 different packages can help much here. The simpler way to implement and maintain it is to have an option somewhere in the UI "support provisioning". If it is turned on, device is provisionable. Otherwise it is not.
Yes, this sounds more logical. Just didn't think it would be possible to do this way.

Even if company has installed the package with provisioning support to the user, he or she can easily remove it and install the version without this support.
As long as the device doesn't have provisioning support enabled (not depending on how it's implemented), server shouldn't allow the sync is it requires this feature?

But my point isn't that how it should be implemented etc. Just that this feature would be important to have somehow to many users.

Edit..

But anyway, guess I'll need to file in a bug report on this. I'll just wait untill I'll have the device in my hands.
Last edited by fouro; 2009-12-01 at 08:27.