View Single Post
Posts: 219 | Thanked: 94 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Helsinki, Finland
#14
Originally Posted by Dexter1759 View Post
Hmmmm I'm torn now, lol. Having never ever looked at Python. Why would it be a better option? What can't it do that Qt can? etc?
Python runs on top of interpreter, so no need to compile and learning curve is considered to be very low compared to C++. Python also enables using C libraries, and Qt bindings for Python do exist.

Nokia is not promoting well known PyQt bindings because of licensing issues, it's building its own bindings called PySide. My current knowledge is that latter is quite immature currently, so stick to PyQt. Licensing difference between these two is that PySide is LGPL, PyQt uses the heavy one.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to naabi For This Useful Post: