View Single Post
Posts: 402 | Thanked: 229 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Missouri, USA
#39
Originally Posted by attila77 View Post
Not to mention PyQt already has documentation as good as standard Qt (as it's mostly generated from the Qt docs ).
Unfortunately, I have found that most of the PyQt documentation is a simple cut/paste job from the original C++ Qt documentation. Since the current bindings aren't pythonic, the syntax is similar enough to deal with this limitation (I believe this was mentioned earlier), but to some it will still be a PITA.