View Single Post
SubCore's Avatar
Posts: 850 | Thanked: 626 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Vienna, Austria
#51
Originally Posted by kwotski View Post
Yeah, there's something kind of puzzling about the root fs. It's supposed to be < 256M, right?
j.s already said it, but here a link with a detailed explanation for this discrepancy:
http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/f...ml#L_df_report

"df" only reports the physically allocated memory and does not account for the compression that's taking place.
"du" however reports the actual size of the files, and not their compressed, physical size.
Thus, "du" will always report a higher usage than "df".
__________________
"What we perceive is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning."
-- Werner Karl Heisenberg