View Single Post
YoDude's Avatar
Posts: 2,869 | Thanked: 1,784 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Po' Bo'. PA
#61
Originally Posted by krisse View Post
"Between planes, airports, and hotels, a WiFi connection is usually always available to her. "

But most people DONT spend their entire lives in major transport hubs.

Most people spend most of their lives away from wi-fi connections (and heck, even within my own flat I have trouble getting a wi-fi signal in the bedroom).

Without some kind of cellular option you will never ever have an always-on connectivity or anything close to it. You might not like the business models that cellular companies use, but you cannot deny that cellular networks have a far more comprehensive coverage of the world.

Because of cellular I can connect when I'm on a bus for example, which is impossible with wi-fi.

This idea that somehow removing cellular would bring us better connectivity is lunacy.
Again it is not an either or proposition... it's both.

Outside the US an AT&T only iPhone would be useless for her. She would not be exposed to the Apple OS and her life would go on without it. However, because she could buy the iTouch, she is using an Apple product.

Her next device could very well be an all-in-one Maemo cell phone however the decision to buy one would now be based on the size, usability, and flexibility of her current set-up. A steeper hill for Maemo to climb. Kudos, Apple marketing.

The corollary to this would be a current, in contract iPhone user who can not try, and will not be exposed to the Maemo5 OS without buying a new cell phone and committing to a different carier... Fail, Nokia marketing.

GK's post illustrates a missed market for Nokia by only offering Maemo5 on a cell phone device not an increased market by offering only a tablet like device...

Apple offers both, Nokia doesn't... simple azat.


No lunacy here, BTW.
__________________

SLN member # 009
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to YoDude For This Useful Post: