View Single Post
Posts: 1,400 | Thanked: 3,751 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Arctic cold of northern .fi
#206
Originally Posted by Fargus View Post
Surely though in order to allow a device design to be retained by Apple rather than by Foxconn then Apple would need to pay the fee? Interesting point though as that would effectively give Foxconn Apple over a barrel! LOL
It's doable. That's the way Apple is currently dodging most of license fees to Qualcomm. Nokia also used same tactic during the Nokia vs. Qualcomm legal-warfare.