Thread
:
N900 Case / Pouch / Screen Protector Thread
View Single Post
oldpmaguy
2010-01-05 , 18:37
Posts: 344 | Thanked: 73 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#
487
Long thread but lots of useful info.
I've decided to go for the Vikuiti, but with one caveat from the general consensus. As such, I'd I'd like anyone's opinion on the following:
One user mentioned something about "hating glare", which reminded me that I hate glare too %^)
I then noticed that the Vikuiti has a specific screen protector for antiglare - the ARMR200
http://www.protectionfilms24.com/art...900-27604.html
This is as opposed to the DCQ-160, which gets most of the talk in this thread.
http://www.protectionfilms24.com/art...900-28210.html
But what I discovered after doing a little more research, is that the ARMR200 style seems to be even better suited to touch-screen use - read here
http://products3.3m.com/catalog/us/e...er/output_html
whereas the DCQ-160 seems to be more of a glasslike, hardy surface for general heavy use
http://products3.3m.com/catalog/us/e...er/output_html
Does anyone care to comment on the differences I've brought up here? Even better, has anyone gone for the ARMR over the DCQ because of a similar sense of the differences between the two?
Ed I found this comment in this thread
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=441
which was very much directed towards my question above. I appreciate this kind of attention to detail, and it makes me think I might like the DCQ better, since I am a bit of a hi-res freak. I still welcome any other comments, however.
Last edited by oldpmaguy; 2010-01-05 at
19:11
.
Quote & Reply
|
oldpmaguy
View Public Profile
Send a private message to oldpmaguy
Find all posts by oldpmaguy