View Single Post
Posts: 288 | Thanked: 196 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ London
#63
Originally Posted by RogerTHAcctant View Post
I understand you think the google nexus one is better than the N900 in some respects. Well lets be honest here, if you wanna call our all the things that the nexus one is better than the N900 your just picking specific things of the N900's weaknesses. All the things the the nexus one excels in is still exceeded by apple's iphone. It doesn't even have multi-touch, web browsing is slower, and because it doesn't have multi touch it's hard to type on without a physical keyboard.

as stated in a review here
http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/g...ks-multitouch/

Now you tell me ONE respectable thing that the google one is better than the n900 AND iphone, besides tying you into all their own google proprietary software

look at this review from engadget:
http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/nexus-one-review/

they basically say it's great, and best andriod yet in terms of software, but they would pick a droid over it.

at least the N900 can multi-task, and just that ONE feature alone, i could say i have something over andriod and iphone

Sure all phones look real good on video at prelaunch, and didn't the N900? But I don't think you should point out all the bad of the N900 before the nexus one had a chance to show it's flaws
Dont be so sheep. I dont believe the engadget browser test was honest. First of all, test was done on only one site and it may have been cached, dubious. Dont believe these bloggers as majority of them are biased quack journalists (engadgets reviews are so poor compared to e.g gsmarena etc).

In any case I dont believe HTC, Apple, google is any match for Nokia hardware or software wise. They only excel at HYPE marketing and branding. Nokia does real research and has the patents to prove it.