View Single Post
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#54
Originally Posted by Rauha View Post
Most of the discussion seem to center around distributing the “stuff” from Nokia fairly. To me that still sounds like proximate argument. It might be nice to have a system that distributes loot in a way that doesn't cause conflict amongst the looters, but is it the best basis for system that helps Maemo most?
It isn't simply an issue of "loot"-- trusted people who get devices early (and possibly free, which can help those like myself who can't afford to buy one) can provide critical input to the program teams to improve the product(s) prior to wide release. THAT benefits everyone... and it's important to get devices into the hands of people who have proven they will use the privilege wisely.

We'll ignore little incidents like usb connectors popping out.

Originally Posted by Rauha View Post
Short version:
Basis of the the system should be the benefit to community, especially since our definition of fairness doesn't necessarily meet with rewarders definition of fairness.
So define the benefit(s). Are we back to ego boosting? Or is it all about loot?
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net