View Single Post
anidel's Avatar
Posts: 1,743 | Thanked: 1,231 times | Joined on Jul 2006 @ Twickenham, UK
#57
Originally Posted by Butterfly View Post
I find it VERY hard to believe, that people have actually tested this firmware for a few weeks and found none of these bugs that only took us lot a day to find. We are the ones who test the firmware, not them! What a joke. I can see this being the very last Nokia phone that I ever buy, unless Nokia get their act together pronto!
So, Nokia has never given a beta firmware out to people to test and you are complained because this didn't work ?
And it didn't work because there are still bugs?

Could you now tell me which software (that has beta testers, or even where beta testing is available [like Firefox]) arrives at its final stable release WITHOUT any bugs?

Could you make this very statement you just made to Windows 7 (where millions tested), to Firefox 3.5 (where millions tested) ?

Where do you see the joke in how Nokia approached this time?
Could you tell me, also, which other mobile company gives out beta releases to regular users to test?
Does Apple do that? I think you pay there.
Does Android do that? I don't think I've ever seen an Android beta FIRMWARE out there.
Does Palm do that?
Does Microsoft do that ?

Nokia does. Today for the first time they do. They are investigating this option.. I really don't see it a joke.

I really don't see where's Nokia's fault here.
ALL the upgrade to ALL the software out there (Linux OSes, Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora etc etc etc) DO have issues with their final supposedly STABLE release even AFTER "MILLIONS" of people have TESTED that release.

Please...
 

The Following User Says Thank You to anidel For This Useful Post: