View Single Post
Posts: 336 | Thanked: 610 times | Joined on Apr 2008 @ France
#114
Originally Posted by RevdKathy View Post
1) People on the mailing list don’t know what’s happening in chat. Errr. No. Sorry, I don’t buy this one. I simply can’t make myself believe that anyone on the mailing list doesn’t know that t.m.o. exists. Sure, you might have problems with of browser access for a period – say while on holiday – but I don’t think there’s anyone who can’t look in at the forum from time to time to see what’s buzzing. If people aren’t doing that it’s because they’re choosing not to. And they should retain that choice – aware of the risks.
This was never said by anyone. If you post an email with a link to a thread, and ask kindly if the mailing list contributors take a look at it, they will. They will comment, mostly as a reply to the mailing list, but they will read and listen. None of us ever said we didn't go to tmo at all, some of us just don't have the time to read through all the different topics to try and find one that is interesting and worth spending any kind of effort on. And no, you can't blame anyone for that.

Originally Posted by RevdKathy View Post
2) People on t.m.o. don’t know what’s happening in the mailing list. This one has more credibility.
Why? I'd be more inclined to believe that the majority of new users (influx from the N900) don't care about Mailing Lists because they believe them to be archaic. We can't blame the mailing lists users and then give a free pass to tmo users. Both have an equal amount of blame to share. Yes, we ought to celebrate our differences, this doesn't mean that some people get a get-out-of-jail card. I'm willing to bet a good chunk of money that nearly every single user who has been here more than two months, wants to be involved and isn't just here to get some apps on his device and then close the browser window knows about IRC and the Mailing Lists. Whether they chose or not to join is another issue.


Originally Posted by RevdKathy View Post
If the mailing list denizens are feeling “Oh Teh Noes! We don’t want that rowdy lot joining our mailing list!” I have two things to say. One is that us voluble forum types can fall strangely silent on a mailing list as it’s not our natural medium. (I may not say much but I am reading now, so you can’t insult me behind my back any more )The other is to request that you ask yourself whether you are really concerned here to keep the functionality of the mailing list or to keep that nice cosy feeling you get from the smaller Old school group where you feel you know everyone. If it’s the latter, maybe the formal maemo.org channels are not the way to do that: I’m trying very hard not to use the word ‘clique’ here, because I don’t think it does apply. But it could.
Not only is this insulting, it's downright outrageous. You go about to make this great and useful post and then lower yourself to the level of all the stupid things that have been said. The Mailing Lists users don't feel part of a secret gang. The truth is most of us don't care. We don't have the time for these kind of stupid little politics games, and drama queens uprisings. The -users mailing list is generally laughed at, the -developers mailing list is pretty well endowed and -community is there to accommodate those users who want to participate but haven't found a better way to do so.

For example, I'm now in Australia, and will be for the next few months. After you've posted this message, there have been nearly 10 replies before I came online. I don't go through every page of a topic, no matter how nice it is, because I don't have the time. I skim through it, and only pay attention when attention is obviously needed. Am I to blame? Yeah, sure. Will I change my behaviour? I'm not going to lose my job because of this community or its tantrums, so no. However, you posted a link/copy of your message to the mailing list (not in the correct, but never mind), which popped up directly on my N900's screen and in GMail when I opened the laptop. I didn't have to look for it, it was staring me right in the face.

There is no ML-users clique. There is no conspiracy to try and keep our ML squeaky clean. We just use it because a/ it's low traffic, b/ I can reply to any message, no matter how many truckloads of messages have been sent afterwards. I know the intended people will read it. I have no such guarantee in tmo. People could never come back to a specific thread after posting a response. How good is the communication then?

Originally Posted by RevdKathy View Post
3) Decisions have been enacted based on the debate in one medium without the users of other medium being aware. WTF??
I've never heard of this, and even if it were true, no important decisions have ever been taken without doing a referendum. Each council can completely change the things that a previous council had put in place, if the community wants it. Don't forget, the Council are here to serve you, it is the community's duty to make sure they do so.

Also, it might be beneficial to point out that at some point, most users (and yes, by this I mean any user who's worthwhile, who is here to make the community go forward, not just download 3 apps and f off) were on both tmo and the ML. ML threads are widely discussed on IRC, and it's rare that one specific conversation doesn't leak into the other media within a day or two.

The following are my personal opinions. As an ML reader/user and tmo user.

Originally Posted by RevdKathy View Post
So the proposals:
1) Encourage people on the mailing list to look in to the forum from time to time to be aware of what’s buzzing.
Denied. People won't do it. You can send links to important messages, as we've done for the past few years, but ask them to willingly go read messages where people go "OMFGWTF NOKIA SHOULD BE FIRED~!!!!~`!11!" is just madness.

Originally Posted by RevdKathy View Post
2) Make the mailing list more visible, and encourage more forum posters to be involved.
Agreed.

Originally Posted by RevdKathy View Post
3) Make sure the Council don’t make decisions until people in all the media have had the opportunity to input their opinions.
This is already in place as far as I'm concerned. During their "electoral campaigns", council members reflect their commitment and knowledge of the community, and the only way to get enough traction now that we have tens of thousands of users, the only way to do this is by being present on every single media.

I will say it once again: There is a solution to this issue, and it is by having aggregated content from all media be published on a weekly fashion. This has been proposed by Jaffa months ago. I also suggest to everyone in this thread to pay very close attention to the Google results linked previously. They contain results for: mailing lists, tmo, twitter, etc.

This, in my opinion, answers the whole thread.

PS: Unless the course of discussion changes drastically (finding a solution rather than arguing in circles), I will close this thread and create a new one as per that goal.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to CrashandDie For This Useful Post: