Thread: The Testing is half empty
View Single Post
Flandry's Avatar
Flandry is offline Flandry
2010-01-18 , 21:38
Posts: 1,559 | Thanked: 1,786 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Boston
#38
Originally Posted by fms View Post
Yes, I remember the meeting. But I do not seem to remember any of the points proposed by Flandry agreed at that meeting. This is kinda troubling, too.
It probably predates that meeting, and is marked "not final": http://wiki.maemo.org/Extras-testing...OT_FINAL_FIXME

If no longer actually part of the testing plan as discussed at said IRC meeting (which transcripts would be nice to see), that section should be removed by someone who is privvy to the information.

It seems the most sensible way to make sure every app is given at least a good testing (as opposed to the present system where it can be resolved entirely by popular vote), but that would mean giving those creepy weird careful tester people some specific tester status.

Nobody has given a sensible counter to that including you, who just seem to be bothered by those who will apply literally a set of guidelines.
__________________

Unofficial PR1.3/Meego 1.1 FAQ
***
Classic example of arbitrary Nokia decision making. Couldn't just fallback to the no brainer of tagging with lat/lon if network isn't accessible, could you Nokia?
MAME: an arcade in your pocket
Accelemymote: make your accelerometer more joy-ful
Last edited by Flandry; 2010-01-18 at 21:43.