View Single Post
Posts: 356 | Thanked: 172 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Canada
#7
Originally Posted by ndi View Post
While nothing to sneeze at, I agree, how much of a quality gain to you expect from the cam? I mean, considering the optics, sensor size, etc, not THAT much is lost in JPEG compression.

There's a reason everyone uses JPEG instead of ,say, PNG which is open and lossless. JPEG compresses better at much lower cost cor both compression and decompression. Compressing and writing a PNG could take many seconds.

Most RAW formats (except for uncompressed RAW) are compressed, if lossless. Uncompressed, an image from the camera is 15MB, that takes up to 8 seconds to write on a standard card.

Again, it's not like I don't want it, I'm simply raising a few questions for discussion. Not a developer on Linux, but a developer and an amateur photographer.
One big advantage of having access to the RAW output though is that you as the photographer get absolute control over any noise-reduction and sharpening that's applied, which can yield far superior results, IMO, especially in low-light situations.

Professional DNR filters like Neat Image (esp. with a custom N900 profile) or Noise Ninja are always going to do a better job processing the image than the camera's internal software. Not to mention that its white-balaning leaves a bit to be desired..

I'm definitely be interested in seeing where this goes!

Last edited by Bingley Joe; 2010-01-19 at 17:18.