View Single Post
Posts: 515 | Thanked: 193 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#143
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
You edited your post after I quoted. Nice.

Odd... I see the defensiveness coming from your direction. I'm being very calm and patient with a couple of guys ranting their heads off with some very disingenuous points.

But that's enough for today. You both continue to grossly misunderstand almost every word I type. Continuing with that would be foolish. So if you're looking for a semantical win, you've got it. Enjoy!
Not sure what you mean, if I edited, I edited within 30 secs Id guess, hence the post not acknowledging the edit.

err yeah I am a little heated because Im frustrated that some people cant seem to take any criticism of the N900. You post below, effectively discounting a lot of the criticism of the N900 as 'noise' seems rather closed minded to me. I understand there are a lot of issues and conflicting reasons for such problems however I find a lot of problems seem to be batted away with the response, but mine is fine (Im referring to many people who have posted in this thread - your comment was obviously made in jest..I hope)

PS Calling my argument disingenuous is rather insulting.

Works fine for me.

Really though: how many is that out of the whole, and how many in that set are failing to configure properly?

Data without context is noise.

Last edited by chrisp7; 2010-01-21 at 23:53.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to chrisp7 For This Useful Post: