View Single Post
VDVsx's Avatar
Posts: 1,070 | Thanked: 1,604 times | Joined on Sep 2008 @ Helsinki
#33
Originally Posted by attila77 View Post
Why ? (out of curiosity, I don't see why being paid would make any difference if the level of authority is the same). Just trying to understand problems to refine the idea.
In the perfect world it shouldn't make any difference, but I've seen voluntary/collaborative 'jobs' turned in paid jobs. When someone has the obligation to do something a large number of people will step away for that, that's in our nature. Of course if the paid person is a good leader, he will minimize the damages and probably can still get a lot of help for his tasks.

Originally Posted by attila77 View Post
I wanted to avoid it being an overburdened position that results in tester fatigue in the end. I see the tester admin or QAmaster position being more of a 'grease' kind (exercising authority only on testing errors or resolving a status quo), rather than a heavy-batted, control-oriented one. If we DO have a group of people who can (on the long run) predictably dedicate an amount of their time and are capable to do this - all the better !
Agree with your points.
__________________
Valério Valério
www.valeriovalerio.org
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to VDVsx For This Useful Post: