View Single Post
Posts: 182 | Thanked: 69 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Netherlands
#33
Originally Posted by ossipena View Post
yes, I respect the idea, but
  • it is about the same work than testing
  • this doesn't get software to extras
  • extras-testing karma is more thorough indication about state of a program than one guys opinion after short test

which part from the words

you dont understand? you could do something better with your time that helps much more than updating application statuses here. and it will be useful to everybody, even those who doesn't want to touch testing...
I'm with ahmadka here.
- this is a quicker and friendlier overview imo. It's clear what it's about. With the Karma page I don't really know if a high karma just says something about stability, or also about user-friendliness, usefulness, and perhaps how many friends the author has on the forum (not saying that is the case, I just don't know). I suppose I could find out, but for that, see the start of this point.
- it is not double work per se to create more than one source of information. How many reviews of the N900 did you read before buying?
- this thread really was the first time I heard about this Karma page. And I've read a lot of posts on this forum before this one