View Single Post
Posts: 455 | Thanked: 278 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Oregon, USA
#452
Originally Posted by schettj View Post
It's *still* a handset. The lifespan is 18 months. Or less. Much less right now since hardware in this space is changing very quickly, and especially in the maemo + hardware space since both are evolving very quickly.

If you want a (possibly) longer-term supported device, waiting for whatever is after the n900 isn't a bad choice. Like the first iphone was never going to be able to be a 3g device, the n900 isn't ever going to be everything the next device is.

Then again, that's always true. The G1 isn't the Nexus One, nor will it ever be. After 18 months, the G1 is looking pretty dated.
The N900 has only been shipping LESS THAN TWO MONTHS and we're already seeing bug fixes being deferred to the next Maemo version.
Last time I checked, 2 mo < 18 mo.

Having just purchased an N900, and taking into account my above statement, why would I want to purchase a new Nokia device that (possibly..lol) be supported long-term?? Nokia has done NOTHING to instill confidence in me about their product and future plans. I openly invite them to do so.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to craftyguy For This Useful Post: