View Single Post
Posts: 277 | Thanked: 46 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#31
Originally Posted by felipec View Post
Anyway, aside from "working better", there are a few extra features, but more importantly; it's more power efficient.

And finally whatever problems you find with it, I will try to fix them... trying to do the same with haze will be much trickier.
For me these are the two most attractive "features".

I had read elsewhere that the stock MSN, and the Haze plugin had power efficiency issues, so I've been playing with using XMPP (via a msn protocol plugin on xmpp.org.uk).

This works, although the contact addresses are somewhat obfuscated due to the % addressing scheme used.

So how is the power consumption for pecan - do you think it's better than the others? How might it compare to XMPP? I know the built in skype seems very good.

Think it's time for me to try pecan...

Thanks