But a exaggerated complaint can be rebutted with truth and facts, a exaggerated praise shouldn't be allowed as well and again will always be rebutted by facts and truth. Also, who said anything about employee post ? Are they doing that ? Would be despicable if true.
So, because it doesn't affect you or other who don't need if those of use that weighed the FF cam into consideration before buying are SOL ?
And for the record I never expected any one to rant or "raving" as you put it. I expect people to acknowledge the device shortcomings and problems. A proper response would be "well I can see where your coming from but I don't need the FF cam so I can't factor that into my assestment of the n900. However I can see how that could be a problem for those of you who did."
But when attack & praise posts implies that it's perfect or must not be discussed mustn't that be addressed ?
Which are not ok imo, if the topic annoys you ignore it.
If ones perspective falls onto the opposite side of facts or lack their of, then what do you call it ? Isn't it more rationale to understand the perspective before bashing it ? I've given you a example of what I had a problem with, you should understand my argument better.