Thread: N97 vs n900
View Single Post
Posts: 173 | Thanked: 160 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ London, UK
#17
I've gone 5110 (borrowed the work 9000 a lot) -> 9110 -> 9210(pile of sh1t) -> 9500 -> 9300i -> e90 -> n97 -> n900

The 9110, 9500 and 9300i were great for their time, I mean seriously great. The e90 is powerful and useful, then 97 has all the sexyness of any new consumer phone with tiny size to boot (IE my first non communicator, _normal_ phone in a decade). The n900 despite actually being small, somehow "feels" MASSIVE, my fingers ache and I find it much more useful to ssh in and do my UNIX geekyness remotely.

The fact that I can do the latter is why I've left my SIM in the n900, but the N97 was marginally better than the e90 which was marginally better than the 9300i. I was rather hoping for a larger WOW factor jump like I got with the transition from 9000 -> 9110 or 9210 -> 9500. The n97 to n900 felt almost like the step back the 9300i -> e90 or 9110 -> 9210 was.

Nokia often release a newer smaller version of the phones they've released with little or no other change (9000 -> 9110, 9500 -> 9300), so I half expect an n910 or n900i model to be an N97 mini with the OS of maemo. That might rock

The lack of symbian/phone style software is a right pisser, but N thousand linux based tools is very useful.

PS My G1 and N1 Androids (given to me) went straight to my wife, she's not looked back since her 9300.

Last edited by damion; 2010-02-11 at 15:25. Reason: minor edit