View Single Post
Posts: 992 | Thanked: 995 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ California
#69
Originally Posted by fatalsaint View Post
This I would have no issue with. As I said.. the RPM v Deb is zealotry.. I'm just operating on the history of RPM-based and Deb-based systems. I historically haven't been impressed.
I had NO problem with RPM-based SuSE YaST years.
But I had and I still have a couple of problems with DEB-ian based Maemo5.

I can't say for sure why is it, but I would like to exclude from this such things like my expertise and so on. Of course, packaging format is closely linked with distribution infrastructure and policies and it is definitely takes toll. For exam - the famous "red pill" removal problem and attempt to hide libraries and administrative application from GUI (Hildon Application Manager). As result - no GUI AM for system-based tools or libraries. Fine 8-[