I think you misunderstand my point
When Nokia posted the first (we will honour the warranty post as long as the phone had not been abused. We all assumed this was the resolution to our problem. I had not abused my phone and they seemed to have acknowledged that some phones were having an issue. I knew at the time that the center may not have heard. So I tok the printouts and was going to ask them to talk to nokia and try and resolve the problem. IF they failed fine send it to Nokia to resolve. After all Nokia was heading the right way. The problem was not tht noka had not sent the update to my centre. The center had indeed received instructions from Nokia that very morning. The update tehy recieved stated that if pads had been removed it was not covered under warranty. This they informed me was the exact same policy they had been following before the update. So it seems clear that Nokia saw the post on Engadget and felt they should address it. Mark S posted that Nokia would handle it to calm down the potential bad publicity But the update they sent out to the service centers did nothing but point out the same rules they had before.
"...the micro-USB port on the N900 may become be detached we have our folk looking into the matter." - MarkS
"We are aware of reports that under certain conditions, the micro-USB port of a very limited amount of Nokia N900 devices can be detached", also "...we are investigating this issue further." vandelay - Nokia Discussion Forum
Now explain why I should not be hesitant to trust Nokias word.