View Single Post
Posts: 2,014 | Thanked: 1,581 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#141
Originally Posted by ewan View Post
I can't. I'm not sure there even is one, but that's completely irrelevant. There is a process for the maemo.org repositories, and it was abused.

You seem to be asking a lot of questions, but not really putting forward your own point of view. Do you think SIO2's behaviour was acceptable, and what, if anything do you think should be done about it?
Actually I have stated in at least 3 of my posts that I think what he did was wrong, but in no way warrants the response of the rabid mob.

As far as what should be done about it. Remove the approval for the app, let him get 10 valid votes - move and and forget about it.

And the vetting process for the OVI store is completely relevant because it ties back to the fact that if the app had shown up there people would have happily installed it without question. The software would still have been made by the same guy that you are all vilifying now, it would still have been the same software and no one would have cared.
__________________
Class .. : Power Poster, Potential Coder
Humor .. : [*********] Alignment: Chaotic Evil
Patience : [***-------] Weapon(s): +2 Logic Mace
Agro ... : |*****-----] Relic(s) : G1, N900

 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Bratag For This Useful Post: