yes, why didn't you spot the abuse first, contact necessary persons and handle this with closed doors? or even better: predict such an abuse and prevent it technically.

it is so easy to say idealistic things afterwards ... it has already happened so absolutely no need to talk in past form. what about lines like "in future there should ...."?
imo it is dozen times stupider to blame peoples initial reactions afterwards than expressing such.

this was the first time. bratag misses the point by miles. we have open ecosystem so we need the trust in order to make things run fluently. sio2interactive was the first one who did something that totally took the trust away with communitys repos. and I got the image that the guy said "sorry, but I'd still do it agan because blahblah". that is something I find unacceptable and haven't changed my harsh opinion even after serious thinking.

everyone should have done better. this applies to everyone in this thread. i suggest we spend rest of the thread stoning the people who stick in the past instead of discussing about improvements.



should there be a bolded point in garage when creating new account? something like "one account per one real person (no one per company etc). creating multiple accounts will lead to removing of all accounts and software etc accordingly plus permanent ban for life"

that would make the risk so big that reward from taking the risk would need to be huge, much more than getting one piece of software to extras.