View Single Post
SubCore's Avatar
Posts: 850 | Thanked: 626 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Vienna, Austria
#187
Originally Posted by fatalsaint View Post
Anyway.. it's all moot: As long as there already is an ARM port of it somewhere.. it's stupid simple to make either a deb or rpm from it to fit our needs.
still...
one of the benefits of having a huge armel repo is that you also don't have to worry about dependencies much. you take the control file 1:1 and just rebuild what's missing, again not having to fiddle with the packaging files.

i imagine lots of possible errors in package dependencies, multiple packages and so on.

it's not difficult of course, still much easier than porting from scratch, but prone to errors IMHO.
__________________
"What we perceive is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning."
-- Werner Karl Heisenberg

Last edited by SubCore; 2010-02-19 at 20:32. Reason: vocabulary *g*
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SubCore For This Useful Post: