View Single Post
qgil's Avatar
Posts: 3,105 | Thanked: 11,088 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ Mountain View (CA, USA)
#141
Originally Posted by Milhouse View Post
Just knowing, for instance, that the OMAP3 optimised version of Flash Player 10.1 is planned for Maemo5 would be great news and shouldn't be considered a secret as most of the competition (apart from the Cuppertino bandits) already appear to have it pencilled in for their platforms.
We can't happily add to our roadmaps technologies owned by others. In a normal world the first one announcing support plans of Adobe Flash in ARM platforms would be Adobe.

Actually we have a similar situation about other pieces of software owned actually by someone else (e.g. hardware drivers, very relevant any time a new device is coming).

Upgrading the kernel in a standard x86 product (e.g. your laptop) is not exactly the same game than going through the same kernel update supposed to run across ARM / OMAP cutting edge devices with all the drivers in good shape.

In a normal world Nokia would only need to care about taking or licensing those kernel or drivers, but the mobile hardware platforms still don't belong to such a normal world. Hopefully MeeGo will help here, and a lot.

In a MeeGo context it will be clear that companies like Adobe, TI, etc are the ones having the initiative about their support towards that platform. In the Maemo 5 case the story is more blurred and the consequence is us not being able to handle such information easily in roadmaps.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to qgil For This Useful Post: