View Single Post
Posts: 56 | Thanked: 17 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Italy
#258
Originally Posted by qole View Post
Wow, that SkyEagle post is a classic example of "that" kind of post!

You would think that people would research a product before buying it, no?
Hi qole ! Thanks for the nice ironic post

But I just let you note that I made some research before buying N900..I saw carefully the spec, some review, some post from the first users ect ect.

I knew what I was buying...in fact I'm not complaining about lack of portrait mode, missing MMS functions etc.

I'm complaining about faulty and not correct advertising (like, for istance, the one related to Mail for Exchange support which was implemented for Exchange 2003 only with PR 1.1 many months later and still not complete in functions and not comparable to the symbian version) or some sync features of the Calendar that don't work in the case of recurring events.
Just to let you see some examples:
http://maemo.nokia.com/features/email/
http://maemo.nokia.com/features/calendar/

The only mistake that I have done is to trust too much in some user comments (which were enthusiatic in the first weeks) and in Nokia capacity to deliver what he had promised explicity or let you believe in the Ads.
I would also expected that they have fixed the main problems in a more speedy way than they're doing.
All these delays have make many users unhappy (at least in Italy many of the initial buyers have already sold the device because of this) and damaged their confidence in Nokia.

I'm still hope to see a really improvment in PR 1.2 (not only QT and some bux fixes) and I'm still keeping my N900 (also because I invested many Euro in it!) but I'm not really happy about this situation .

I had many Nokia phones in the past and would like to stay with N900 for quite a long time...if it is possible !

Regards,
SkyEagle
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SkyEagle For This Useful Post: