I'd still like to know how the n900 is more of a microcomputer than, for example, an iPhone. Just because one feature came first doesn't mean it's any better at it than another phone. I'm just tired of people using the excuse "You should have known you were buying a computer that just happened to have a phone argument" when people are dissappointed with the n900. People buy the n900 as a phone because it has more phone features than features that make it a "tablet."