View Single Post
Posts: 2,802 | Thanked: 4,491 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#124
Originally Posted by jaem View Post
if it's listed under the "Official platform/applications" section in the bugtracker, we're essentially redefining "official"
The confusion with the word "Official" could perhaps be avoided by renaming the classifications, but another problem is the QA contacts (which are shared with Fremantle so we can't change them and we don't want to spam Nokia with "our" bugs either).

So, after some consideration I'm leaning towards the separate product option. I propose we create a "community-something" product under Extras, with some pre-defined components based on what patches are currently available, plus a "general" or "other" in case something fresh comes along.

Workflow-wise, should we re-assign the existing bugs to Extras/Community/whatever or clone them?

I don't really think option #1 is a viable choice, though, especially in the long term.
To be honest, I don't see this as a very long term activity. There are only a finite number of contributed patches we can package after all, and I remain hopeful that Mer^2 and/or Meego will provide a more viable distribution for the OMAP2 devices in the long run.

Do we (we being the maemo.org team and/or the community at large) have anything currently set up that would work provisionally for bug reporting? I don't mean a full tracker, but a forum thread is a very inefficient and ineffective method for bug reporting. At the very least, why don't we start a new one for testing, and leave this one for discussion?
You mean something other than bugs.maemo.org? I'd like to avoid that if possible for various reasons (the bugs, discussions and patches are already on bmo, users shouldn't have to create yet another account to file bugs etc).

Originally Posted by buurmas View Post
What version number would we use?
At the moment I'm using the pre-existing versionsing scheme, simply because I didn't want to think too much about it (the testing SSU is '5.2010-09-2" for example, or perhaps it should start with 6?) but it's not cast in stone, ideas welcome. Keep in mind that for all intents and purposes it is a slightly patched Diablo so a radical departure like calling it Elephanta or something would seem misleading/inappropriate.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post: