Having not been able to see the schematic before posting that, I thought perhaps it showed the twl4030 as the phy. That's not the case.

So the twl4030 (cribbing from the tps65950 datasheet) can drive vbus using an integrated charge pump. In order to drive vbus, cp.in needs to be connected to vbat. It is. r6 (cp.gnd) is grounded which is also good. However, I don't see any indication of the CP flying capacitor being present. According to wikipedia, the source of all knowledge, a charge pump uses a capacitor to operate. AFAIK that would not be integrated with the twl4030, so the charge pump can't operate. I also don't see vbus going to any other power supply.

So the question is, why not have the charge pump? The 4 things I can think of is a) it added too much noise b) it doesn't actually work c) it can't supply enough power to meet spec d) it's stupid and tries to charge itself off its own charge pump.

Or perhaps there is no integrated charge pump on the chip they used. As I understand charge pumps are expensive and they may have decided the demand didn't justify the additional cost.

Also, even though the ID pin is connected to the twl4030, I suspect that normally this interrupt needs to be signaled through the ulpi interface (I think that's what normally happens) which the twl4030 can't do.