I suggest we start lobbying to free up the maemo.org trademark.", Texrat says. This sentence needs clarification since currently there is no such "maemo.org trademark". maemo.org is part of the Maemo trademark owned by Nokia. The maemo.org logo was designed and seleted in a communty contest and it has a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. What does Texrat's proposal mean in practice? What is the freedom sought with this proposal? And in general, what proposal pushed by the Maemo community affecting maemo.org has been stopped by Nokia? Guys, you are really steering this boat. We at Nokia help when/where it makes sense to complement your efforts.