Quoting ONE SENTENCE of his (and that's along with fully crediting him with his name and direct link to his blog). That's what - in his opinion - gives him the right to call people thieves and plagiarists in public and send them rude emails.

As if it was making any sense and difference (not to mention being DOABLE) to rephrase that short sentence merely stating that "the engine is faster than in PCSX but disk access lags". He said it himself, so what was wrong with quoting it? Really strange. He's the first programmer I've met over the last 11 years (and I've been in touch with a lot) to have any objections against quoting his own official program announcement. I guess he feels so important that he considers every word of his to be worth his weight in gold. But how can NORMAL people know it? I'd suggest he puts a copyright mark after every sentence to communicate it.

He wrote to me that I am restricted to only quote 20% of what he wrote, which in case of that one sentence would mean 2-3 words max, i.e. just the name of his and his program, PERIOD. Really funny person.

A talented programmer, and a boor in one. Wash & go.

To save myself further insults, I think I will refrain from announcing new programs from him in the future. Which is actually a shame as I wanted my Software catalog to be as complete as possible or else it doesn't make sense.

Cheers,
Michal Jerz
My-Maemo.com & My-Symbian.com