View Single Post
Posts: 5,795 | Thanked: 3,151 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Agoura Hills Calif
#31
Originally Posted by Crashdamage View Post

I just don't get where everyone keeps saying Firefox is slower than MIcroB. It does start up slower because it doesn't pre-load into memory at boot like MicroB, but loads webpages just as fast when I compare the two. Firefox has a newer rendering engine, runs javascript as fast or faster than MicroB and handles some complicated websites I have to access for work better than MicroB. Am I missing something here?
I agree with you, but I find navigating around the interface to the bookmarks etc clumsy enough that it becomes a cause of slowness in itself.