Hello to all.
Todays night i've done somes speed tests when booting up the N900, using diferent kernel images. They was:

1-Test With StockImage 600 Mhz.

Since, Click Power Botton to "Enter Pin" Screen.
00:00:21:834
Since, Click "Advance" on "Enter Pin" Screen to All Widgets appear on desktop.
00:00:50:651
Total time = 00:00:21:834 + 00:00:50:651


2-Test With Lehto 900 Mhz Stock DSP:

Since, Click Power Botton to "Enter Pin" Screen.
00:00:17:032
Since, Click "Advance" on "Enter Pin" Screen to All Widgets appear on desktop.
00:00:40:235
Total time = See first exemple

3-Test With Lehto 900 Mhz 500 DSP:

Since, Click Power Botton to "Enter Pin" Screen.
00:00:17:045
Since, Click "Advance" on "Enter Pin" Screen to All Widgets appear on desktop.
00:00:42:445
Total time = See first exemple

Ok, it's not 100% accurate\fiable\credible (Dont know how to say it well in english, sorry), because i used my two hands to double click the mouse (i used http://stopwatch.onlineclock.net/) and the N900, but i've tried to touch them at the same time.

I've done the test 3 times, and the results was similar, so, i post here one of them.

I can resume that the boot speed of those two 900 Mhz images are similar, and the 600 Mhz stock more slow. (Nothing new..just to confirm with test results!)

If anyone want to try it .

Here are my 4 Desktops (a lot of things, i think lol)


(just edited this one because of the pics of friends and famaly).